![]() Sequential (fixed order): The players fire one at a time in a fixed, repeating sequence, such as A, B, C, A, B, C, A. What you might be looking for in game theory the games are called Truels (three people) or N-uels (n people) or the simplified version Duals (two people). ![]() Which strategy has the best outcome for Last Man Standing scenarios? Should they 'level' the playing field by reducing the opponent's health or should he go for eliminating whole players out of the game? I think that the best strategy for last man standing scenarios are to feed and assist the weaker (but not too much) so that they will eat each other to the point where it's a Pyrrhic victory. ![]() So, when it comes to 1v1, you will have a much better advantage. A shot from the sniper will do damage of fifty.Ĭonsidering you don't miss shots, Who would you shoot? My brother said ''Well I would shoot at B to eliminate him out of the equation.'' But think about it this way: If you shoot at C, he is down to 30 health and when either of them is done with his enemy (I am talking about B and C) he will have 30 health, even in the best scenario. Number B has a health of 30 and number C has 80 health. B and C are in close combat, while you, on the other hand, have a sniper and have the choice to shoot at number B or C. Let's assign each player a letter, you are A and the other two are labelled B and C. There are 3 people in this last man standing type of game, they all have the same level of skill and luckily, you aren't in combat. ![]() For analyzing the situation, consider the game mechanics of a simple shooter game like CSGO. A last man standing situation is one where each player is for himself and has to eliminate all other players to win. Let's imagine a last man standing scenario in a video-game. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |